Gough v UK (Application no. 49327/11), 28 October 2014 – Read judgment

Gough v UK (Application no. 49327/11), 28 October 2014 – Read judgment

Nude rambler gets no assistance from European Court of Human Rights – Diarmu 27 2014 by Guest Contributor november

Gough v UK (Application no. 49327/11), 28 October 2014 – browse judgment

The applicant in this full situation happens to be over and over over over repeatedly arrested, convicted and imprisoned for breaching the comfort by perambulating nude in public areas. In a judgment passed down recently, the Court that is european of Rights found the united kingdom authorities’ restriction of his legal legal legal rights under Articles 10 and 8 associated with Convention, proportionate to the genuine goal of preventing condition and criminal activity.

Stephen Gough features a strong conviction that nothing is inherently unpleasant concerning the human anatomy, and that he harms no-one by walking on nude. A very, strong conviction. He has been nicknamed the ‘naked rambler’ and has spent most of the last eight years in prison, and most of that time solitary confinement since he set off on a naked walk from Land’s End to John O’Groats in 2003.

Freedom of phrase – nakedness in a place that is public

31 October 2013 by David Hart QC

Gough v. Director of Public Prosecution 2013 EWHC 3267 – read judgment

Mr Gough desires to down walk up and great britain naked. Other people try not to accept with this, so their progress was significantly stop-start. This appeal has to do with a short and autumnal that is inglorious in Halifax. He had been released through the regional nick at 11.30 am on 25 October 2012, wearing just walking shoes, socks, a cap, a rucksack and a compass on a lanyard around their throat. “He had been otherwise nude along with his genitalia had been on simple view. ” Then he strolled through Halifax city centre for around fifteen minutes.

When you look at the terms associated with the judgment, he received a “mixed reaction” from the inhabitants. A minumum of one member that is female of general general general public veered out of their method. Proof from two ladies would be to the result which they had been “alarmed and troubled” and “disgusted” at seeing him nude. One of many ladies ended up being having quantity of kids a minumum of one of who, 12 years old, she reported as “shocked and disgusted”. The region judge discovered that it caused one of many ladies to feel in danger, and, further, based in the proof, it caused security or stress.

Welcome to the UKHRB

This website is run by 1 Crown Office line barristers’ chambers. Subscribe at no cost updates right here. Your blog’s editorial group is:

Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC Martin Downs Jim Duffy

Totally Free e-mail updates

Enter your current email address a subscription for this weblog for receive and free regular notifications of brand new articles by email.

Groups

Current Articles

Current commentary

Geoffrey Beresford H… on Loss from illegal governmenta…
Jonathan Edwards on What’s waiting for you for judi…
Steve Hawkins on Doctor/patient privacy…
Andrew on Weekly gather: March Madnes…
Jake Maverick on Strasbourg Court guidelines against…
Jake Maverick on Strasbourg Court guidelines against…
Steve on Twitter, trans legal rights and the…

Disclaimer

This website is maintained for information purposes just. It’s not meant to be considered a way to obtain legal counsel and should not be relied upon as a result. Websites mirror the views and viewpoints of these specific writers, maybe how to message someone on sugardaddyforme not of chambers in general.

Our online privacy policy is available on our ‘subscribe’ page or by pressing right right here.

Disclaimer: this web site is maintained for information purposes just. It is really not meant to be described as a way to obtain legal services and ought not to be relied upon as a result. Blogs mirror the views and views of these authors that are individual perhaps perhaps maybe not of chambers in general.